1996 Zagato Bravo vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Zagato Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Zagato Bravo would be higher.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Zagato Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Zagato Bravo | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
| Make | Zagato | Nissan |
| Model | Bravo | Juke |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
