1997 AC Cobra vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1997 AC Cobra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 AC Cobra (365 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 154 kg more than 1997 AC Cobra.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 AC Cobra (579 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1997 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 AC Cobra | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | AC | Toyota |
| Model | Cobra | Celica |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 365 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 579 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2640 mm |
