1997 AC Cobra vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1997 AC Cobra is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 AC Cobra (365 HP) has 305 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1997 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 AC Cobra (579 Nm) has 477 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1997 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1997 AC Cobra | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | AC | Nissan |
Model | Cobra | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1997 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 365 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 579 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2440 mm |