1997 AC Cobra vs. 2001 Daewoo Lanos
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 AC Cobra (365 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 9 kg more than 1997 AC Cobra.
Because 1997 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 AC Cobra (579 Nm) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (150 Nm). This means 1997 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
1997 AC Cobra | 2001 Daewoo Lanos | |
Make | AC | Daewoo |
Model | Cobra | Lanos |
Year Released | 1997 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 365 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 579 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 1035 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 48 L |