1997 AC Cobra vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 AC Cobra weights approximately 76 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1997 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 AC Cobra (579 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 477 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
1997 AC Cobra | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | AC | Mazda |
Model | Cobra | Rustler |
Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1323 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 365 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 579 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1026 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 54 L |