1997 AC Cobra vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 AC Cobra would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 AC Cobra (365 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2012 Holden UTE. (357 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 AC Cobra (579 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 1997 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1997 AC Cobra | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Cobra | UTE |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 365 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 579 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |