1997 AC Cobra vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 AC Cobra would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 AC Cobra (579 Nm) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1997 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1997 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 1997 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 AC Cobra | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | AC | Smart |
| Model | Cobra | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 365 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 579 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 1867 mm |
