1997 Acura CL vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (179 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1997 Acura CL. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 20 kg more than 1997 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Acura CL | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | CL | BLS |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4826 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1781 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1389 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2715 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 58 L |
