1997 Acura EL vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 91 kg more than 1997 Acura EL.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura EL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 1997 Acura EL has manual transmission. 1997 Acura EL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Acura EL | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Acura | Nissan |
| Model | EL | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1079 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4478 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1704 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1394 mm | 1450 mm |
