1997 Acura Integra vs. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1997 Acura Integra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 188 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Acura Integra | 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Integra | 6C |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2443 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.1 mm | 100 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |
