1997 Acura Integra vs. 1963 BMW 502
To start off, 1997 Acura Integra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 502 weights approximately 278 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura Integra | 1963 BMW 502 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | Integra | 502 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3168 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2840 mm |