1997 Acura Integra vs. 1965 Austin A 90

To start off, 1997 Acura Integra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin A 90 weights approximately 358 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.

Because 1965 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1965 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Acura Integra 1965 Austin A 90
Make Acura Austin
Model Integra A 90
Year Released 1997 1965
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1797 cc 2910 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 120 HP
Torque 176 Nm 221 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 2750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 83.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87.1 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.6:1 8.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1212 kg 1570 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2750 mm