1997 Acura Integra vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 1997 Acura Integra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 188 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Acura Integra | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
| Make | Acura | Jaguar |
| Model | Integra | E Type |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.1 mm | 106 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2450 mm |
