1997 Acura Integra vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1997 Acura Integra is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 363 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura Integra | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Acura | Dodge |
Model | Integra | Challenger |
Year Released | 1997 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 6974 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 351 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 529 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2800 mm |