1997 Acura Integra vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 63 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Acura Integra (176 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Puma. (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1997 Acura Integra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura Integra | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | Integra | Puma |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.1 mm | 83.5 mm |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 202 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2450 mm |