1997 Acura Integra vs. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne has automatic transmission and 1997 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1997 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Acura Integra | 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | Integra | Cheyenne |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1950 mm |
