1997 Acura Integra vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1997 Acura Integra. (138 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura Integra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 594 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (172 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura Integra | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Acura | Jeep |
Model | Integra | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 78 L |