1997 Acura Integra vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1228 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura Integra | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Acura | Land Rover |
Model | Integra | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 2440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2890 mm |