1997 Acura Integra vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1997 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1997 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Acura Integra | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Acura | Holden |
| Model | Integra | Calais |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
