1997 Acura Integra vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Acura Integra | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Acura | Holden |
| Model | Integra | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
