1997 Acura Integra vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 585 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura Integra | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Acura | Jeep |
Model | Integra | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2423 mm |