1997 Acura Integra vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra. 2011 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 1997 Acura Integra has manual transmission. 1997 Acura Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura Integra | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | Integra | F-250 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3967 mm |