1997 Acura Integra vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 703 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.

Because 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 570 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Acura Integra 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Acura Cadillac
Model Integra CTS-V
Year Released 1997 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1797 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 556 HP
Torque 176 Nm 746 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 3800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1212 kg 1915 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1455 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2880 mm