1997 Acura Integra vs. 2012 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2012 Fiat Croma is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura Integra weights approximately 272 kg more than 2012 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Croma (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2012 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura Integra | 2012 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Acura | Fiat |
Model | Integra | Croma |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1797 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 201 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |