1997 Acura Integra vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 627 kg more than 1997 Acura Integra.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura Integra. (176 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Acura Integra | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Acura | Jeep |
| Model | Integra | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.1 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1839 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4161 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2423 mm |
