1997 Acura NSX vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura NSX would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura NSX (272 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 240 kg more than 1997 Acura NSX.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 338 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Acura NSX. (284 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura NSX | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | NSX | Celica |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 272 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 7300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 284 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2440 mm |