1997 Acura TL vs. 2012 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2012 Jeep Compass is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (200 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2012 Jeep Compass. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2012 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Acura TL | 2012 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Acura | Jeep |
Model | TL | Compass |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3200 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 172 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4864 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1786 mm | 1814 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1405 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2634 mm |