1997 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Alfa Romeo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Alfa Romeo 145 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1997 Alfa Romeo 145. (102 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1997 Alfa Romeo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 622 kg more than 1997 Alfa Romeo 145. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Alfa Romeo 145. (124 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Alfa Romeo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Alfa Romeo 145 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 145 | CTS |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1370 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |