1997 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1997 Alfa Romeo 156. (152 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1997 Alfa Romeo 156. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1997 Alfa Romeo 156. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 156 | 62 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 98.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |