1997 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 (134 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 156 | 140 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2620 mm |