1997 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 (152 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 40 kg more than 1997 Alfa Romeo 156.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Alfa Romeo 156. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 (187 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
Model | 156 | CJ |
Year Released | 1997 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1969 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2380 mm |