1997 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 (134 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 750 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 (304 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Tata |
Model | 156 | Nano |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 37 L |