1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut (148 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Alfa Romeo Sportut | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | MCC |
| Model | Sportut | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1520 mm |
