1997 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2000 Subaru Outback is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Audi A3 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru Outback weights approximately 315 kg more than 1997 Audi A3.
Because 2000 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi A3 | 2000 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Audi | Subaru |
Model | A3 | Outback |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 206 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 89.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.5:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |