1997 Audi A3 vs. 2001 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Audi A3 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1997 Audi A3.
Because 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 2001 Jaguar XJ220 has manual transmission. 2001 Jaguar XJ220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi A3 | 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A3 | XJ220 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Top Speed | 191 km/hour | 354 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2230 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2720 mm |