1997 Audi A3 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Audi A3 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Audi A3 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | A3 | XF |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |
