1997 Audi A4 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1997 Audi A4 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Audi A4 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Audi A4 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | A4 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |
