1997 Audi A4 vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1997 Audi A4 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Audi A4 (160 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Because 1997 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Audi A4 (231 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 1997 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Audi A4 | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | A4 | Elan |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2393 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.5 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2140 mm |
