1997 Audi A4 vs. 1965 Jaguar Type S
To start off, 1997 Audi A4 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar Type S weights approximately 204 kg more than 1997 Audi A4.
Because 1965 Jaguar Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi A4 | 1965 Jaguar Type S | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A4 | Type S |
Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 3440 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |