1997 Audi A4 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1997 Audi A4 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Audi A4 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1966 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi A4 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | A4 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 33 L |