1997 Audi A4 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1997 Audi A4 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Audi A4 weights approximately 531 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Audi A4 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | A4 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 25 L |
