1997 Audi A6 vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Audi A6 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TL-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1997 Audi A6. (108 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TL-50 should accelerate faster than 1997 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Audi A6 weights approximately 78 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Because 2000 Ford TL-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TL-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Audi A6. (235 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi A6 | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | TL-50 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 37 L |