1997 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1997 Audi A6. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1997 Audi A6.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Audi A6. (310 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi A6 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | XF |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1894 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.5 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |