1997 Audi S4 vs. 1966 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1997 Audi S4 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Audi S4 weights approximately 212 kg more than 1966 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1966 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi S4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Audi S4 | 1966 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Audi | Isuzu |
| Model | S4 | Bellel |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |
