1997 Audi S4 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1997 Audi S4 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Audi S4 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi S4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi S4 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | S4 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1997 | 1969 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 5210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |