1997 Audi S4 vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1997 Audi S4 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi S4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Audi S4 | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | S4 | Etna |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 95.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.2:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 290 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2520 mm |
