1997 Audi S4 vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Audi S4 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Audi S4 weights approximately 242 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi S4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1997 Audi S4 has manual transmission. 1997 Audi S4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi S4 | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | S4 | Artic |
Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |