1997 Audi S4 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Audi S4 would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 80 kg more than 1997 Audi S4.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi S4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi S4 | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | S4 | CTS |
Year Released | 1997 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 2597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 83.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 79.6 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |