1997 Audi S4 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Audi S4 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Audi S4 weights approximately 154 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi S4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Audi S4 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | S4 | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 1358 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 90 L |
