1997 Audi S4 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Audi S4 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 516 kg more than 1997 Audi S4.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Audi S4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Audi S4 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | S4 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1512 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 100 L |